Why Linux Is Better For Programming | คู่มือการเขียนโปรแกรม ที่เว็บไซต์

And of course.. Tiling wms

I kinda hate the "package manager" as a reason to use Linux. Yes, it's technically great, but 90% of the time you try to install software, the package manager does not know it and you either have to somehow enable snap installs or add some rpm repository or maybe be forced to download the program files and extract them manually. As a result, you have a much bigger mess with your installs on Linux…

Reasons why Windows is better for programming:
-Linux has terrible driver support for anything that isnt cookie-cutter standard hardware. Most extension stuff like dedicated sound cards don't work on linux.
-Bluetooth support on Linux is unbearable.
-A lot of software has bugs or missing features on Linux (spotify, slack (automatic mic boosting even though its off, drawing on a sahred screen isnt available) etc.)
-A lot of professional software you might even develop for doesn't even run on linux without buggy workarounds.
-WSL2 basically gives you the possibility to use the linux features you want on windows
-Most people use windows and you end up installing a windows VM on linux anyway
-With linux you have to google for hours to just find someone with a similar problem and the solution often ends up being digging deep into the OS to edit some config file. And it doesn't even guarantee it will work, because some distros use slightly different config files.

I like linuks for keeping in live old netbook from 2009 with celeron@1×1.2GHz(its possible to watching yt witch 720p thanks to SMtube, but it isnt comfortable experience :P) and dads office PC from 2007(its upgraded with Chinese 4core xeon – its still smooth for net browsing and watching yt in 1080p)

great video thanks a lot

Yet another video about programming in Linux that just jacks it off instead of giving real reasons why it's supposedly better for this particular purpose. At this point everyone knows it's safer and more customizable, tf does that have to do with programming?

One of the most powerful tools I have seen is Walgrind, and it's Linux only. Memtrace is unusable, buggy and lacks the functionality.

ofc sudo apt works for every app… What about apps which are not in ppa or some apps which you need to use .deb file? .exe works same everytime. Linux is not easier…

Y'all really comparing an API vs a file based system lmao

has this guy ever tried mac os ? you literately download the file. and drag it to the Applications an it installs. i love how these people make linux sound perfect. dont get me wrong i love zorin os. i use it on my personal systems . but linux weakness is GRUB so many rock solid systems break due to power outage when windows an mac os is more resilient , my office computer runs mac os the company i work for. i dont like the UI or even enjoy using it. but its rock solid an never crashed

Docker

OK, there's a TON of disinformation in here about Windows. But when he got into this nonsense about having to reboot Windows often after updates, I had to jump in.

As a person who has written countless installers and who is familiar with Linux at a deep level, I can tell you that is not true. Windows programs do NOT have to reboot, as long as they are installing into user space, and the vast majority of them don't need to install system components, so rebooting is only necessary in very rare circumstances.

Linux is built EXACTLY the same way. In fact, many of the usual Linux talking points seem to think it is built differently than Windows, when it's actually very, very similar. In fact, with Windows' hybrid driver model, it needs to reboot less often because the user space portion of such drivers can be reloaded on the fly.

In any case, on either Linux or Windows, you tend to only have to reboot a few times while installing really heavy duty tools that like to use system components which aren't necessarily included on the base OS, and that's over really quickly.

Now, anyone want to spar over Linux's totally false advantages in driver support? How about stability (huge lol!) or security?

There is something about Linux that I can't find in Windows. sudo rm -rf /* …. maybe

Ok, your first point is an out and out lie. Malware and viruses that target the Linux kernel are very real. Telling users they don't have to worry about them in the age of ransomware is borderline malpractice. Never assume your OS is secure out of box. Horrible, ludicrous advice!

36 hour cialis cialis generico generic cialis online canada

stromectol buy how much ivermectin to give a 50lb dog fenbendazole and ivermectin combination

price of amoxicillin without insurance amoxil generic buy amoxicillin 500mg online

diabetes and ed ed treatment options drug prices